Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Nearly 500 anti-government protests in Iran in past month - Iran Focus

-We must continue to beat on the door of the Islamic Republic until we break it down. There is no doubt in my mind that we will make these murderous tyrants crumble. It's only a matter of time before thousands of protesters turn into millions. Once we reach that point we will have won the battle. Time is ticking Khamenei... We are comming after you.
London, Jun. 28 – There have been some 480 anti-government protests in Iran since in the Iranian calendar month ending June 21, according to a tally provided to Iran Focus by Iranian dissidents.

Students were the most politically active group in the past month, having organised at least 136 demonstrations, sit-ins, gatherings, and strikes.

Workers took part in some 60 protests.

Among the month’s major protests was a 100,000-strong anti-government rally by ethnic Azeris in the city of Tabriz against the publication of an insulting cartoon in the official daily Iran.

Subsequently, thousands took part in often violent anti-government demonstrations in the towns of Orumieh, Zanjan, Marand, Naqadeh and Ardebil. At least nine people were killed by government forces in the course of clashes with the protestors.

Several hundred people were arrested during a major demonstration by Iranian women on June 12.

There were also several demonstrations by students in four of Tehran’s universities.

Dissidents accuse the government of imposing an atmosphere of repression in Iran in order to terrorise citizens and dissuade them from taking part in protests.

At least five women and two 18-year-olds were executed in Iran in the past month alone.

Original Article

Monday, June 26, 2006

More than 20 killed in Iran crash - BBC

-Iranian roads are some of the deadliest in the world. The reason for this is simple: Those who are charged with the security and safety of the Iranian people are too busy arresting, torturing, and killing innocent people than keeping them safe. Why is it that we constantly have to hear about tens of people dieing on the roads of Iran? Instead of beating up women because they don't have a headscarf on, the government has a duty to make sure that roads are built properly and that people are following the law. It's a shame that this many people have to die for no reason. This is one of many examples where the Islamic Regime has failed miserably.
Twenty-two people have been killed and about 20 injured in Iran when a bus crashed head-on into a truck on a highway between Birjand and Nahbandan.

The accident occurred in the early hours of Monday in the province of South Khorasan.

Police said the truck had drifted into the lane of the oncoming bus.

Iran has one of the worst traffic safety records in the world, with many thousands killed each year on the country's roads.

The accidents are blamed on poor police supervision, reckless driving and badly maintained roads and vehicles.

Original Article

Sunday, June 25, 2006

MPG Underground Paper Posted in Iran

-Here are 3 images of Marze Por Gohar's fourth underground publication that was posted in Iranian streets. Our brave compatriots in Iran are working hard to educate and empower the people so that they may free themselves from the murderous grip of the mullahs.

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Stronger and Stronger We March Towards Freedom

-This is a call to all those who love peace and freedom. We need all those who are willing to put minimal time and effort in order to some good in this world. Iran will be freed. It will be freed because the people of Iran want to live in a democratic and prosperous Iran. This is an invitation to all those who want to make a difference. Iranians and non-Iranians alike are encouraged to contact our offices abroad and get involved. If each of us put in a couple hours a week to fight these mullahs they won't stand a chance.

Long Live Iran
Title: Marze Por Gohar Party

The first shot fired shattered the kitchen window. The second hit closer to the door and after a few more aimless shots attempting only to announce their arrival, the Revolutionary guards shot off the lock on the door and forced their way in. They entered through the neighbor’s yard and surrounded the house. The thumping sound of their boots running through the yard resembled a scene from the movie Rambo and was disturbing enough to make their 3-year-old neighbor who was playing in the yard, swallow the last bite of her peach together with the pit.

The guards poured in sadistically elated to find all their targets in one place. Farahanipour and his friends were in the middle of a meeting, deciding what steps to take next. They remained seated around a round table in the dining room. The first guard approached the group and suddenly kicked one of the young girls in the face. Stunned by his audacity, Farahanipour and the rest of his friends were roused. One of the young men began to speak up, “Leave her alone!” They lifted him out of his seat by his shirt collar. A punch in the jaw hurled him onto the couch. Now they felt they had to comply. Government officials ransacked Farahanipour’s house, collected most of his personal belongings and handcuffed him and his friends. When they ran out of handcuffs they began using telephone wires to tie their hands behind their backs and violently threw them in the back of an unmarked van.

They raided Roozbeh Farahanipour’s house the day after he and his friends organized a student uprising at Tehran University July 9, 1999. They were arrested and badly tortured. They had hopes of toppling the Islamic Republic or at least letting the world know that they were anything but idle; or so that’s how Farahanipour, now sitting in a small garden office in Westwood, likes to describe actions that may seem futile and rebellious to many but not to him.

“We never thought we’d get the kind of turnout that we did, but it only confirmed how fed up everyone was,” he says trying to remember more specific events of the day. “I liked the feeling of solidarity, running through the streets and chanting slogans at the clerics. ‘Khamenei, be a man, be a man and free the land!’” That was the only non-profane slogan he could think of. While the translation works, the slogan means more in Farsi.

He masks a lot of the events with a smile as he retells them. The masking becomes a challenge when he begins to talk about the torture, the beating and the uncertainty of making it through another day.

They asked him his name. He answered, “Roozbeh Farahanipour.” Suddenly, they hurled a chair in his direction, aiming for his head. The head guard screamed, “Roozbeh is dead! From now on you are number 607.” That was his cell number.

The prison heads were particularly fixated on beating his hands; poetic justice for a writer. They’d whip him until he bled, bruised, and they’d do it all over again. At times, he says, his hands became so numb; he couldn’t tell if they were still attached to his body. They tried to break as many fingers as they could, succeeding with three over the course of his imprisonment.

Every time that piece of wood would come down in flogging action against his hands, Farahanipour would close his eyes, hold his breath and prepare for another. They were relentless, hitting the students’ backs and soles of their feet. As they hanged from metal beams across the ceiling, they would be beaten until the guards saw the first signs of blood. Sometimes they wouldn’t even stop at that. But Farahanipour says he and the others would try to show strength and resilience so they would start singing the Iranian national anthem -- the same anthem banned by the Islamic Republic and replaced with an Islamic version. The singing would only cause the guards to hit them harder. Their screams echoed in the prison.

He now sits by the window in his office looking out at a tailor shop and laser hair treatment spa going through a box of mostly old photographs that sits on his lap. He takes out a yellow blindfold decorated with royal blue flowers and puts it on the table. Hesitating to take his eyes off the blindfold, he reaches back into the box. One by one he takes out the photographs and with a look of discomfort he peppers the table with reminders of his past. “They killed this man,” he says pointing to a man standing on the side of his fourth grade class picture. “He was a priest.” With less deliberation this time, he hurries to put his hands back in the box. He takes out a couple more. The one on top is of him and four friends sitting with a chocolate cake. It is his 20th birthday. “This girl,” he says, forced to stop, take a partial breath and stroke his hand through his thick black hair. “This girl was arrested a few weeks after this photo was taken and beaten to death.”

Thirty-four-year-old Farahanipour resembles his childhood pictures. He still has that baby face with two big, black eyes that turn almond-shaped when he smiles. He’s not so tall, and not so short, but his lofty yet eloquent Farsi rhetoric gives him a tall stature.

By training, he is a journalist and a lawyer, and ashamed to admit that he now has to host tables at Shamshiri, a Persian restaurant on Westwood Boulevard, in order to pay the bills.

Things haven’t changed that much for Farahanipour absent the beating and torture. Now they have an American twist. Farahanipour runs his political party Marze Por Gohar, MPG or Glorious Frontiers Party out of Los Angeles, sometimes called Irangeles, the closest place to home. Their platform has stayed the same. They are still in search of a way to bring down the Islamic Republic and to replace them with a secular and democratic alternative. They lobby in Washington D.C., organize rallies and protests, speak at universities and publish a monthly magazine in hopes of educating and “awakening” Iranians living in Iran and abroad.

Prior to the protest he worked as the publisher and chief editor of a popular monthly dedicated to Iranian studies. The journal was quickly banned by the Islamic Republic when Farahanipour attempted to publish the names of 57 individuals murdered by the government.

Farahanipour was prevented from publishing again and determined to get freedom of speech rights for journalists. In1998, Farahanipour along with some of his colleagues organized The National Society of Journalists. They quickly realized that, when dealing with the Islamic Republic, the only way to get things done was to enter the political arena. From then the journalism society became known as the Marzeh Por-Gohar political party.

Farahanipour’s political inclinations started when he was young. He was only in the second grade when he says he committed his first “political act.” It was right after the Revolution when Muslim clerics dismissed a popular children’s television host, Ehteram Boroumand, who had refused to wear the Islamic veil on television. Farahanipour objected to her dismissal, so he led his classmates to the yard and staged a protest, chanting, "We want Mrs. Boroumand now (yaallaa)". He also remembers receiving his first beating from the school headmaster, who used a heavy, wooden ruler.

Among the dusty pictures is a wrinkled copy of the last magazine Farahanipour had published. On the cover it says in Farsi, “If you speak you will die. If you remain quiet you will die. Why not speak and die?”

Farahanipour chuckles in a matter-of-fact way, as though he was entrusted with this duty and has no option but to carry it out. “If I were going to be scared, nothing would ever progress,” he says as he describes a new batch of death threats he received on the internet this week. “They said in three weeks we will find you and kill you.” He shrugs. “I’ve heard a lot of this before.”

It is all too familiar for Farahanipour who says he’s been on the Islamic Republic’s radar even before the protest. The government referred to MPG as an “illegal party” and called Farahanipour a “leader of the unrest” from the start. So when he was arrested with several others, he knew his punishment would be worse. The blindfold gave it all away.

When they arrived at the prison all the students were forced to change into prison uniforms. Farahanipour kept thinking about the girls in the group who were asked to undress in front of the guards just the same. He knew that their modesty, which is so revered in Persian culture, wouldn’t be respected. Then they were all blindfolded with standard grey blindfolds. Farahanipour’s was different. “They wanted me to be easily distinguishable,” he says, recalling the ridicule, name calling and abuse.

Despite all the abuse, Farahanipour says his mother suffered the most. As she saw the men entering their home, her first reaction as a typical Iranian woman was to run to the kitchen to bring them some tea. Farahanipour laughs as he describes his mother’s naïveté. She saw no difference between her son and these young men. To her, they were all Iranian children. When she brought out the tea, she was surprised to find that they wouldn’t drink it. The guards of course, figured she was trying to poison them. When she realized what was actually going on and that her son was taken away, she began to panic, but severe anxiety consumed her only after she received a fake call from the prison saying they had killed her son. Another student’s father died of a heart attack when he got that same call. Ironically his son lived to hear about it.

After 11 months of interrogations, he was released on 50,000,000 Rials bail, around $10,000, paid with the deed to a friend’s house. As much as he loved his country he says, he knew if he stayed he’d be killed. He quickly gathered whatever personal belongings the guards hadn’t seized and escaped to Turkey.

While the tortures and abuses of the Islamic Republic are over for him, Farahanipour says they are still watching, citing an instance not too long ago when he found that his office was bugged. Around that time, Farahanipour noticed a van that would park outside the office frequently. He reported it all to the FBI and soon after, the van disappeared. “Let them watch me,” he says, open about his political views and convinced that the days of the Islamic Republic’s reign in Iran are numbered. He laughs, remembering times when, knowing his lines were tapped, he would answer the phone, “good day to all our listeners.”

Now, Farahanipour can’t shake the streets of Tehran with his messages and hopes for reform, but he hasn’t given up hope of shaking them from afar. “If I didn’t think I could make a difference living here, you can rest assured I’d never be here,” he says. To an outsider, Farahanipour seems like he’s settled well in Los Angeles. He works out of a nice office, has his group of friends, works a steady job and most importantly enjoys American freedoms. Despite his acknowledgement of it all, when people ask how he likes living in the United States, he most often says, “It’s a nice home. But it isn’t my home.”

After a short stay in Turkey, he arrived in the U.S. in 2000. Since then, Farahanipour has spent most of his time educating and familiarizing others with his party. Even though Farahanipour and most expatriate Iranians have been against the idea of an Islamic Republic – having a formerly secular country like Iran in the hands of clerics -- the number of dissidents who have adopted a voice has increased as current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s extreme views such as taking Israel off the map and Holocaust denial have become public. Farahanipour and his party have never felt a better opportunity to push for a free Iran.

The environment in Iran is perfectly set up to support a revolution, he says citing that more than 2/3 of the country’s population is under the age of 30. Young Iranians are completely westernized. They love Ipods, extreme sports and, unfortunately, illegal drugs.

“This is the ideal time,” says University of Southern California Professor of political science Eliz Sanasarian. “If the opposition to this regime is serious about what it hopes to accomplish, then this is the time for them to come together, to unify and to connect with the population inside the country.”

“There is a sufficient middle class that will welcome a revolution, and if it’s accompanied by economic changes, the other classes will go along with it as well,” Sanasarian says, pointing to various conditions that make it an opportune moment for a revolution such as the country’s love for modernization and a high unemployment rate.

One of the obstacles opposition groups have faced in recent years is unity. There are many groups who oppose the Islamic Republic garnering support both inside and outside Iran, yet they do not necessarily agree with one another. There are the monarchists who favor the return of the monarchy overthrown in 1979 under the Shah’s son now living in Virginia. There is also the Mojahedin-e-Khalgh or MEK who believe in an Islamist Marxist government. Incidentally, the MEK is listed as a terrorist organization with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Dissatisfaction with the post-Revolutionary government has been high since its start, but Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is considered to be the extreme. He is a radical conservative with Islamist and populist views, catering mostly to Iran’s conservative religious and lower economic classes. While the Islamic Republic has never seen eye-to-eye with the United Nations, or with the United States for that matter, Ahmadinejad’s outlandish comments and refusal to cease nuclear proliferation has put the country in the international spotlight.

Last September, shortly after elections in Iran made Ahmadinejad the sixth president of the Islamic Republic, he was scheduled to fly into New York to be at the United Nations. Farahanipour helped organized the rally of thousands that appeared in front of the U.N., protesting not only his welcome in the U.S. but his position as president of Iran. With help from his supporters, Farahanipour chartered an airplane to take protesters to New York. He says that while people came from as far as Norway and from several U.S. cities including Denver and Jacksonville, the media failed to grant the event the coverage it deserved.

Tight-knit networking and intelligence have been cited as the reasons behind the Islamic Republic’s success. Farahanipour also blames the media. Only recently has there been any coverage on Iran, but that’s just politics. There are seldom reports on the people of Iran. “If the world understood how people are living, how they are treated, what poverty is like in certain places, and contrast that with the amount of money these mullahs pocket or hand out to terrorist organizations to carry out suicide bombings, then they’d be more inclined to push for regime change,” Farahanipour says.

What he tries to stress most in his political campaign is the vast difference between Iranians and their government, which he refers to as a “foreign import” from the Arab world. After the people of Iran revolted against their monarch Shah Reza Pahlavi, Farahanipour says the replacement, religious cleric Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was able to turn one of the most progressive and westernized countries in the Middle East into a religious third world country which coincidentally possesses oil. Women went from wearing miniskirts to covering everything from their heads to their toes. They went from taking pride in their westernized cities to taking pride in their religious and undeveloped rural areas.

“When Khomeini was entering the country they asked him a very important question. He had been in exile for 15 years and they asked him how do you feel about entering Iran again and he answered, ‘I have no feeling.’ That was obvious that this regime is anti-Iranian. Their actions prove to us that they are looking to spread the influences of Islam and Arabic, there’s nothing Iranian about that”

But the people of Iran have not changed. They wear their miniskirts under their cloaks. They wear the latest styles and makeup. Plastic surgery is as common as anything. They throw parties in their homes, take lavish trips to ski resorts and soak up the sun in nearby Dubai. For the most part, they are still Iranian nationalists who strongly oppose the fundamentalist mentality of their government. Most importantly, their kindness hasn’t changed. It was the kindness and compassion of fellow Iranians that allowed Farahanipour to eventually escape the country in 2000. A bus driver and several passengers helped him hide between the luggages stowed beneath a bus in route to Istanbul, Turkey.

“You can’t say that because someone is living in Iran, they are supporters of the regime. It’s not like that,” especially when you consider the number of religious and cultural minorities that have trouble getting clearance to leave the country. Others are loyal to their country, despite the hands, or claws rather, that currently hold it. They put up with the government to stay on Iran’s soil and refuse to be buried anywhere else.

“Our difficulty is organization. Organization, organization, organization. There you go. Three solutions for Iran’s future. We are in a bad situation right now with the election of Ahmadinejad, Iran’s nuclear proliferation and the supporting of terrorist actions around the globe. If the people of Iran make an effort to topple their government, the world would no longer recognize the Islamic Republic.”

As American political and possible military confrontation with Iran becomes almost inevitable, Farahanipour says Iranians are losing time. Although the Iranian government has persuaded its citizens that another revolution is too costly, Farahanipour says the price of a revolution is better than a war on Iranian people and our homeland.

“This is a historical moment. We have to make world powers and the people of Iran aware. So this is our problem. We have to awaken America and other foreign powers. We have to be the messengers. These are tough things to do considering the financial limitations that opposition groups are faced with. But if someone loves his country, this might be the last chance. Maybe our country is testing us to see how whether we will put aside our lives, our money and anything we have to defend what’s most valuable to us.”

Original Article


Simon Etehad tipped me off to Coffee Zinio in Westwood--a small Iranian cafe run by a friend of his--but let it be known that, even though the gathering was being sponsored by the Marze Por Gohar Party (Iranians for a Secular Republic), I wouldn't find him there. Simon was completely incredulous back in January 2000 when friends wanted to organize a caravan to the Rose Bowl to watch the Iranians take on the US team in a friendly. "How can you root for a country that throws you out, that takes everything you own, even executes you?" With the election of Ahmadinejad, Simon's stance had hardened, even if his friends in the MPG would be waving the old Shir-o-Khorshid flag rather than the current Islamic Republic design.

Zinio is a throwback to a time when the coffeehouse was a laboratory of political association rather than a place to buy Cranium. There was a flyer placed prominently on the wall that reads, "Islamic Fundamentalist is the Worst Weapon of Mass Destruction," and another one that says, "We strongly condemn Germany's release of Islamic Republic terrorists and murderers of innocent Iranian dissidents." Unlike Simon, the crowd at Zinio – largely friends of MPG--delineated between Iran and the Islamic Republic. The latter never circumscribes the former.

Babak Namdar, MPG's Director of Foreign Policy, insisted that place transcends politics. "This is the national team, not the government's team." He recounted an episode prior to my arrival early this morning that Lisa Daftari repeated later of an Iranian woman walking by the café making a stink that Zinio was flying the Shir-o-Khorshid. "This is not the real flag," she wailed. Namdar conceded that there were a fair number of Iranians in southern California--particularly in Orange County--who are "pro-regime."

Like Etehad, Daftari is an Iranian Jew. Daftari maintained that secularists who support Team Meli, "culturally still believe in the people of Iran." Sepehr Aryannia, MPG's L.A. branch coordinator, agreed. "Since you can't make statements of political expression, this is how you blow off steam," according to Namdar. "The sport helps bring people together. After the games, people will go out and associate."

For Aryannia, soccer--like political association -- is good for secularism.

Original Article

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Iran Intelligence

Here is a link to a website that is dedicated to collecting information on members and supporters of the Islamic Regime world-wide. If anybody has any information, including pictures, of people who have supported the Islamic Republic please send the information by using the link below. All the information you give is totally confidential and the information that you give will be used to bring these criminals to justice.

Friday, June 02, 2006

The Moral Imperative of Freedom in Iran - Front Page Magazine

- This is a well written article by a friend of the Iranian people, Mr. Kenneth Timmerman. I am posting this article one day late, but better late than never as I always say!
Author: Kenneth R. Timmerman

Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice threw down the gauntlet on Wednesday, offering the Iranian regime a clear choice between confrontation and accommodation with the West.

If Iran immediately suspends all uranium enrichment activities in a transparent, verifiable manner, she said, “the United States will come to the table with our EU-3 colleagues and meet with Iran’s representatives.”

If not, then the U.S. and its partners have agreed on a package of “progressively stronger political and economic sanctions” that will inflict “great costs” on the Tehran regime.

Rice took great pains to spell out clearly the types of rewards a compliant Iran could expect if it chooses to “persuasively demonstrate that it has permanently abandoned its quest for nuclear weapons.”

The U.S. will back Iran’s civil nuclear energy aspirations, and gradually could expand economic cooperation. Ultimately, this could lead to “a beneficial relationship of increased contacts in education, cultural exchange, sports, travel, trade, and investment,” she said.

At first blush, it would appear that Rice has acceded to those who have been urging the administration to offer a “grand bargain” to Iran.

Among the many advocates of doing business with the Tehran regime are U.S. oil giant CONOCO, Boeing, and any number of trade associations, whose interests are obvious.

Their views have been packaged and given a policy veneer by the likes of Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski, who urged the Bush administration in a 2004 Council on Foreign Relations paper to lift U.S. trade sanctions and seek an accommodation with the mullahs in Tehran.

Ka-ching! as my friends at CNBC would say.

I have always taken issue with the economic arguments of the policy “realists,” because we are not dealing with a realistic regime.

For the past eleven years, this regime in Tehran has endured sanctions. U.S. efforts to block foreign investment, while not entirely successful, have prevented Iran from enjoying the fruits of the oil boom, which are so immediately obvious to Iranians who travel to neighboring Dubai.

Why should a regime that is on the verge of fulfilling a long-standing effort to acquire nuclear weapons, pursued at great cost, now abandon that effort just because we say please and offer a few goodies?

Former German foreign minister Joschka Fisher offered a more Faustian argument for accommodation with Tehran.

Writing in the Washington Post on May 29, Fisher abandoned the niceties of the lobbying crowd and got right to the point. “There can no longer be any reasonable doubt that Iran’s ambition is to obtain nuclear weapons capability,” he said.

That is precisely why the West should offer the mullahs in Tehran a “grand bargain,” he argued – if by so doing we can prevent the regime from acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it to “become a hegemonic Islamic and regional power.”

As part of the “grand bargain,” Fisher believes the United States and its European partners must offer Iran “binding security guarantees,” including a permanent recognition of the regime. The “horrible consequences” of war “must force the United States to abandon its policy of no direct negotiations and its hope for regime change.”

Joschka Fisher is right about one thing. Legitimacy is the only currency the regime in Tehran truly covets, because U.S. support for their opposition is the only threat they truly fear.

For the United States to acknowledge the legitimacy of the regime of velayat-e faghih – absolute clerical rule – would be taken as a great victory in Tehran.

It would sound the death knell to the aspirations of the Iranian people to freedom, and would remove whatever restraints still remain on the barbaric behavior of a regime that continues to stone women to death, rape children in jails, and pursue Christians and Jews and Bahais and others because of their religious beliefs.

This is a regime that throws students out of third-floor dormitory rooms, for the “crime” of demanding freedom.

This is a regime that murders freedom in Iraq, and boasts of recruiting thousands of suicide bombers to launch against America.

Unlike Fisher, Condoleeza Rice acknowledged a moral component to American foreign policy

"The nuclear issue is not the only obstacle standing in the way of improved relations," Rice said. She cited the regime's support for terror, its involvement in violence in Iraq, and its efforts to violate Lebanon's sovereignty as additional “barriers to a positive relationship.”

More importantly, she refused to offer the regime any guarantees. And that is why the regime will make the wrong choice (as far as its survival is concerned), and refuse this last best offer from the United States and the international community.

President Ahmadinejad has said repeatedly Iran has a “sacred right” to nuclear technology, and has no intention of abandoning its efforts to enrich uranium. He revels in defying the international community.

The state-run Islamic Republic News Agency noted just hours after Rice made her offer public that Iran considered it “a propaganda move.”

IRNA quoted Kazem Jalali, a spokesman for the Foreign Policy and National Security Committee of Iran’s Islamic Consultative Assembly as noting that the regime “has announced repeatedly that suspension of uranium enrichment is not in Iran’s agenda.”

The hard work begins tomorrow, or next week – whenever Iran makes its refusal known officially and our European partners finally recognize that it’s all over.

It is not yet time to unleash the dogs of war. It is time instead to help the Iranian people to achieve their freedom.

Given the high stakes, we have a moral imperative to attempt what no American administration has attempted before: to give the Iranian people the means they need to build a massive non-violent movement, well-coordinated and well-organized, to challenge the clerical tyranny that is bent on leading Iran to devastation.

Because devastation is the only alternative future for this regime, for the Iranian people, and for the entire region, should the United States fail to lead and fail to accept the moral imperative of freedom.

Original Article